The second wave tackled various dimensions of women\u2019s lives, including motherhood. Later waves \u2013 the third and fourth \u2013 I do not find inspiring, as they deal with issues too abstract and symbolic to positively impact women\u2019s lives<\/strong>. The third and fourth waves of feminism even challenge the very concept of \u201cwoman\u201d, arguing that being a woman is determined by identification rather than a reproductive role. Regarding motherhood itself, they support surrogacy, which leads to extreme alienation of mothers and commodification of their children. <\/p>\n\n\n\n The second wave of feminism began after World War II. What happened during the war? Women from all social classes entered the workforce to replace men called up for military service. After the war<\/a>, capitalist countries decided to remove them from the labor market to make room for returning veterans. In socialist countries, women largely remained part of the workforce. They rarely held managerial positions and could not easily rebel against this \u2013 feminism was considered a \u201cWestern invention.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n However, they could work in all sectors of the economy and pursue education<\/a> as long as they wanted in their chosen fields. The situation was different in France or the United States, where second-wave feminism began with women\u2019s dissatisfaction at being pushed back into homes governed and maintained by men. These homes \u2013 understood both as a place of residence and a source of love and upbringing \u2013 were to be nurtured by women.<\/p>\n\n\n\n We recommend:<\/strong> Chinese People Used to Shun Their Daughters. Today, They Are Invaluable<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Which approach was more beneficial for mothers? In my opinion, the first one, although it would be best to combine it with freedom of speech for women and opportunities for advancement identical to those of men. At that time, however, this was a distant future melody. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Fertility rates were high on both sides of the Iron Curtain during this period. This fact was neither unusual nor stemmed from adopted ideologies<\/a> \u2013 more children are always born after wars than usual. Humanity thus fills the gap left by those killed during the conflict. This happens even though the loss of men is usually greater than the loss of women. However, it is women and their procreative decisions that are more important for the survival of human societies<\/strong> (which is why we calculate fertility as the average number of children per woman of reproductive age, not per adult man).<\/p>\n\n\n\n Western second-wave feminism thus put forward the now obvious postulate to finally start appreciating mothers, instead of attributing their achievements to the men they were associated with.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Reflection on motherhood was extensive in second-wave feminism and often became a source of disputes. Three years after the war, Simone de Beauvoir wrote The Second Sex<\/em>, in which she speaks about motherhood with great distance. This was caused by women being pushed out of the labor market and entrusted to the power of husbands. Absolute power \u2013 laws punishing domestic violence appeared in France<\/a> only in the 1960s, and it was then that the principle requiring a husband\u2019s consent for a woman to work was abandoned.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Children meant greater dependence on a man and his will. Beauvoir thus called for deeply considering the decision about motherhood, as it could prove to be the end of a woman\u2019s freedom. The philosopher was strongly criticized for this attitude. Once, during a radio conversation, a man asked her why she was talking about motherhood when she had not given birth to a child. Her response became historic: \u201cAnd have you given birth?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n We recommend:<\/strong> Family Roots: A Wellspring of Self-Assurance<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n In the United States, too, women were pushed out of the labor market after the war. The economic boom of the late 1950s and early 1960s saw middle-class men competing for high salaries. Their wives were expected to care for children and maintain homes while becoming ideal consumers rather than workers. A domesticated image of femininity was promoted: an alluring housewife<\/a> in full makeup and an elegant dress, ecstatically using the latest vacuum cleaner model.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Betty Friedan termed this the \u201cfeminine mystique\u201d and in her 1963 book of the same title, described how the proliferation of this vision truly affected its recipients. Studying non-working middle-class wives, she discovered that beneath the facade of happiness lay \u201cthe problem that has no name.\u201d It consisted of a lack of space to pursue one\u2019s plans and interests, or even to think about them contrary to the official narrative of fulfilled femininity that needed nothing more than a husband, children, and a beautifully maintained home.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Friedan did not deny that these were real values and sources of happiness but pointed out that the full realization of this model meant rejecting female autonomy and potentially entirely different goals.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Wives from affluent American suburbs did not need to be educated. Women went to college but did not finish. The dominant narrative treated their studies solely as an opportunity to meet a future husband. It was emphasized that the first child should be born early. Thus, any academic or professional ambitions of women had to fall victim. Friedan lamented that while in the socialist world there were female professors and doctors, in the United States a woman could at best be a \u201cprofessor\u2019s wife\u201d or a \u201cdoctor’s wife\u201d \u2013 the spouse of a man fulfilling himself in a given field. The situation with politics was similar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n American women had voting rights, but it was assumed that the social world external to the home should not interest them. As Friedan describes, mothers and wives realizing this model exhibited symptoms of frustration<\/a>, the suppression of which led them to neurosis<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The Feminine Mystique<\/em> became a bestseller<\/a>, allowing this situation to change tangibly. Second-wave feminism was born in the United States. It was a movement positively disposed towards motherhood but reconciling it with women\u2019s autonomy. The book also faced criticism. It was accused of not addressing lower-class, generally non-white women who did not give up low-paid work to take care of children because neither they nor their husbands could afford it. <\/p>\n\n\n\n This shows a certain superiority of the socialist advancement of women through education and professional work. It was particularly striking among women from working-class and peasant backgrounds who were the first in their families to complete higher education. As we know from family stories, this was achieved without the division into middle-class women weary of prosperity and proletarian women envying the luxury of staying at home. As I have already noted, a clear shortcoming of this policy was that it did not allow feminist reflection to be born.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Adrienne Rich\u2019s Of Woman Born<\/em> (1977), a seminal second-wave feminist text, merits particular attention. Rich analyzes motherhood as a profound experience exclusive to women, but also as an oppressive, male-imposed institution that alienates women from this experience<\/strong>. She chronicles the treatment of mothers across cultures and social classes, highlighting how their efforts for children were almost always attributed to or appropriated by men. Rich calls for change, advocating for recognition of mothers\u2019 creative work in childbirth and child-rearing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This is best achieved, she argues, when women have autonomy in deciding whether, with whom, and how often to become pregnant. In essence, she marries pro-women and pro-motherhood stances. Inspired by Rich, Sara Ruddick\u2019s less-known but valuable 1989 publication, Maternal Thinking: Toward a Politics of Peace,<\/em> posits that the maternal experience equips one with a mode of thinking that should underpin approaches to issues like international politics.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This theme echoed earlier feminist thought, such as that of utopian socialist Flora Tristan (1803\u20131844), who believed that women\u2019s learning during pregnancy and childcare could later support building a just society. Given today\u2019s welfare states where people indeed live better, this vision proved, so to speak, fertile and worthy of continuation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n We recommend:<\/strong> Being Honorable: Does It Even Mean Anything Today?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n To avoid an overly saccharine portrayal \u2013 which, rightly or wrongly, is often associated with motherhood\u2019s influence on women \u2013 it is worth noting a second-wave concept deeply averse to motherhood. Shulamith Firestone\u2019s The Dialectic of Sex <\/em>(1970) argued that the female sex would remain exploited by and subservient to men as long as women bore the burden of childbirth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Firestone saw no positives in the maternal experience, let alone any female advantage over men, as demographics might suggest. Her solution was a post-gender utopia where pregnancy occurred outside the human body and people could define their identity and orientation independently of sexual reproduction. In a sense, this vision too was prophetic, though it gained negative connotations. Surrogacy represents a deliberate separation of motherhood from pregnancy<\/strong>, enabling child-bearing for those who could not otherwise procreate. However, Firestone was an outlier among second-wave feminists, who largely appreciated motherhood\u2019s importance and demanded respect for it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Motherhood occurs within specific historical, economic, and social conditions. These have made the maternal role challenging for women throughout most of human history, often entailing subordination to men. Simultaneously, mothers possess a unique perspective that recognizes the undervalued yet truly important, even crucial, aspects of human existence. How, then, can we improve mothers\u2019 situations while increasing their thought patterns\u2019 influence on social life? This cannot be achieved without understanding second-wave feminist concepts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n They teach us to view the world from a deeply human, humanistic perspective \u2013 for the perspective of women, including mothers, is one of direct care for another human being.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Translation: Klaudia Tarasiewicz<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Polish version:<\/strong> Czy feminizm jest przeciwko macierzy\u0144stwu? Obalanie mit\u00f3w<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n![\"Feminism](\"https:\/\/holistic.news\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/feminism-and-motherhood-2.jpg.jpg\")
Feminism and Motherhood in the Post-War World<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Which Approach Best Supports Mothers?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Motherhood as a Threat to Freedom<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Feminism and Motherhood: The Feminine Mystique<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Frustration in the American Suburbs<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
![\"Feminism](\"https:\/\/holistic.news\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/feminism-and-motherhood-3-1024x576.jpg\")
The Rise of Second-Wave Feminism<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Feminism and Motherhood as a Value<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Motherhood\u2019s Double Edge<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Feminism through the Voice of Mothers<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n