Reports on AI in schools emphasize that it has real potential. Artificial intelligence can automate the grading of simple assignments, suggest materials, adjust the difficulty of tasks, and even help detect students\u2019 problems. Freeing teachers from routine and tedious duties offers a chance for a renaissance of humanistic education<\/strong>: more conversation, more discussion, and more cultivation of empathy and critical thinking.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The master-pupil relationship may once again become the center of education. But only if teachers are ready for it, and only if the system does not take shortcuts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Unfortunately, the same studies warn that teachers today often lack solid preparation. Training remains fragmentary, focused on operating tools rather than thoughtfully integrating them into the teaching process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A lack of preparation among staff<\/strong> means that, in many schools, artificial intelligence becomes a convenience for laziness<\/a>: generated essays, automated grades, ready-made lesson plans without the necessary reflection. A child accustomed to instant answers from an algorithm loses patience for laborious, deep thinking.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Alongside this, research in recent years has consistently shown the advantages of analog education<\/strong>. Students who read on paper achieve higher results in comprehension tests than those who read the same text on a screen. The effect is especially visible with longer informational texts and under time pressure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Paper supports deeper processing of information<\/strong>, better retention, and stronger engagement of neural networks responsible for attention and memory. Handwriting activates more areas of the brain than typing on a keyboard. It improves not only motor skills, but also understanding and recall. Reading on a screen, by contrast, more often leads to \u201cshallow processing,\u201d jumping through the text, and weaker concentration.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Investing millions in AI in schools while neglecting paper books<\/a> and handwriting is an educational mistake<\/strong> whose consequences we can already see in falling reading comprehension and attention.<\/p>\n\n\n\nWhy paper still wins against the screen<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
AI in schools: an educational mistake?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n