In 2026, recognizable brands once again dominate cinema screens and release calendars: Avengers: Doomsday<\/em>, Toy Story 5<\/em>, and Spider-Man: Brand New Day<\/em>. This is no accident. It signals a much wider phenomenon. Producers and media corporations prefer to reheat proven intellectual property rather than invest in original, uncertain visions. As a result, the lack of originality in cinema<\/strong> no longer looks merely like an aesthetic problem. It reveals the logic of an entire system of production and distribution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to Parrot Analytics<\/a><\/em>, when researchers looked at the 10 highest-grossing domestic films in each year from 2013 to 2023, excluding 2020, they found that 76 percent were reboots, remakes, sequels, prequels, or spin-offs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In the last 3 years, among 66 titles that earned more than 100 million dollars in the US, 71 percent belonged to already existing franchises. Original films still get made, but they rarely break into the top tier of the box office. Analysts at Parrot Analytics put it bluntly: audiences vote with their wallets<\/strong>, and new film concepts lose to predictability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Behind this caution stands, above all, the economics of uncertainty<\/strong>. Major film productions now cost enormous sums, and failure can hurt not only a single title but also a studio\u2019s entire quarterly results. When a budget runs into the hundreds of millions of dollars, every decision about a new project becomes a test of investor confidence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n No wonder media corporations increasingly prefer proven formulas<\/strong> to stories that might surprise audiences, but might also disappoint them. James McMahon, a scholar who studies the political economy of culture, describes<\/a> this logic of risk well:<\/p>\n\n\n\n The largest distributors have sought to prevent the art of filmmaking and its related social relations from becoming financial risks in the pursuit of profit.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n In this model, originality does not disappear. The system pushes it to the margins. Since the 1980s, the largest studios have systematically reduced uncertainty through franchises, sequels, and repeatable formulas. This is not simply a matter of screenwriters lacking talent. It is the result of a structure<\/strong> in which a safe return on investment wins over artistic risk.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The logic of streaming platforms<\/strong> deepens the same problem. Algorithms<\/a> favor content similar to what viewers already know, because predictability usually means better clickability and a lower risk that someone will abandon a title. Marketing works in much the same way. It is easier to sell a familiar world, known characters, and another chapter in a popular brand than a completely new story that first has to earn the viewer\u2019s trust.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In practice, this creates a situation in which programming and promotional decisions increasingly rest on safe data rather than creative intuition.<\/p>\n\n\n\nProducers Fear Risk<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n
Why Originality in Cinema Gets Pushed to the Margins<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
![Algorithms<\/a> favor content similar to what viewers already know, because predictability usually means better clickability and a lower risk that someone will abandon a title. Marketing works in much the same way. It is easier to sell a familiar world, known characters, and another chapter in a popular brand than a completely new story that first has to earn the viewer\u2019s trust.<\/p>\n\n\n\nIn practice, this creates a situation in which programming and promotional decisions increasingly rest on safe data rather than creative intuition.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n](\"https:\/\/holistic.news\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/The-Influence-of-Algorithms-on-Decisions.jpg\"){kind=link}