Science
The Dark Side of Sport. When Physical Activity Harms
07 November 2024
We exist in an age characterized by incessant acceleration. This reality is notably marked by a constant craving for more stimuli, a tendency toward multitasking, and excessive consumption. However, scientific advancements and the corresponding changes occurring within the brain necessitate time. Development hinges on the ability to retain information, engage in reflective thought, understand one’s cognitive processes (metacognition), and experiment with new applications through lived experiences. While these activities may ostensibly slow us down, they are fundamental in transforming us into more enriched individuals.
Education is undergoing significant transformation. Today’s learning environment necessitates the exploration of innovative solutions, chiefly due to the distinct attitudes and learning approaches of modern students. In broad strokes, today’s youth have an urgent need for abundance and immediacy in all facets. They thirst for knowledge, skills, and, most importantly, affirmation of their uniqueness. Students can access information with unprecedented speed. With the aid of countless videos, they are able to quickly acquire specific skills. By turning to social media, they easily seek validation for their choices. Nonetheless, this dynamic is hardly synonymous with authentic learning, which, at its core, simply demands time.
The world has been undeniably accelerating for some time, a shift largely attributable to the emergence of ‘digital natives.’ These individuals, born into an era of widespread internet use, interact with electronic devices and gadgets with an almost instinctive ease. The concept of ‘digital natives’ was first introduced by Marc Prensky, an American media scholar, writer, and designer of educational systems and computer games, in an article for “On the Horizon.” Prensky and his colleagues found that while youths using tablets or smartphones do read more quickly, they retain less information and fundamentally face more significant learning challenges. Further research has identified several defining characteristics of this generation, including:
Both students and an increasingly large fraction of teachers are continually broadening their abilities to collect information. This tendency, while expansive in scope, often promotes a superficial engagement with the material, concurrently leading to physical changes in the frontal lobe. This brain region is crucial for encompassing vision, abstract reasoning, and anticipating outcomes. An excessive mental workload increases stress, hampers concentration, and reduces the efficacy of the actions undertaken. These consequences are particularly pronounced in activities requiring heightened awareness and concentration, such as those encountered in school settings.
David Handel, the co-founder of iDoRecall, highlights the negative impacts of ‘accelerated’ learning. His company excels in aiding students to thrive academically, utilizing established cognitive science principles. Handel’s own academic journey transformed when he embraced these learning principles. He promotes ‘slow reading,’ an approach facilitating more effective learning. While educational theorists stress reading comprehension, Handel asserts that purposeful learning reading necessitates substantial time. This approach enables metacognition, activating supportive learning and memory retention processes.
This approach contradicts the basic principles promoted by speed reading advocates, especially habits designed to circumvent regression and subvocalization. Regression involves revisiting challenging or misunderstood words, and subvocalization is the silent recitation of words during reading. Personal experience suggests that murmuring text and revisiting previously read sections decelerates reading. Nonetheless, scientific insights affirm that these practices enhance memory retention and information transfer to long-term memory.
Speed reading has its merits and is worth practicing. It proves advantageous when a swift content overview is needed. However, it falls short when deep knowledge acquisition is the objective, as comprehension diminishes with increasing reading speed. If our goal is to learn, we must endeavor to integrate new information with previously acquired knowledge. Only then can we link new content in our minds with what we already possess, thereby paving the way for its potential application in the future.
To comprehend the principle of slow reading, it is essential to understand how our memory operates. Commonly, we might conceptualize memory as a process of depositing information into our brain’s expansive storage. However, this simplification does not capture the full picture. In the late 1960s, Richard Atkinson and Richard Shiffrin, psychologists at Stanford University, proposed a model comprising three stages of information processing, each with distinct storage durations. The stages are as follows:
The initial step involves not so much recording content as if in a dictionary or encyclopedia, but rather associating it with various contexts derived from our experiences, emotions, and prior knowledge. In other words, we note not merely an individual character, but a specific potential whose value depends on our personal resources, and the time and effort we devote to memorizing a particular content.
Storage, under Atkinson and Shiffrin’s framework, progresses through three subsequent phases, engaging sensory memory, short-term memory, and long-term memory. The sensory register briefly holds sensory impressions, such as images, sounds, or tastes. Short-term memory, demanding concentration, links these sensory elements to useful pieces of information already in our possession. This connection facilitates the third stage, retrieval, by sparking mental associations, visualizations, or reflections. This step is integral to tapping into long-term memory and fundamentally strengthens pivotal learning components: reflection, assimilation of new content, and the generation of unique solutions.
True learning and understanding go beyond simply grasping the text we read. Although important, comprehending written material is just one facet of personal growth and maturity. Our reading endeavors should foster the acquisition of new skills, preparing us to tackle future challenges and innovate. This process is akin to forming a web, much like the internet, by creating new mental links with existing knowledge. Slow reading plays a crucial role here, providing not just the means for understanding or briefly memorizing, but for developing a rich network of neuronal connections. These connections integrate our experiences with an array of existing information, practical uses, and emotional responses, thereby activating metacognition — a form of self-reflection on our thinking processes. This intentional self-monitoring is key to enhancing learning efficiency.
Engaging in an internal dialogue while reading deepens our understanding of the material. It is beneficial to ask ourselves questions such as, “What does this mean?”, “What have I learned?”, or “What confirms or disputes this information?”. This practice can lead to numerous metacognitive inquiries, prompting us to consider:
Posing such questions consciously during reading is essential. Though metacognitive reading may slow our consumption of new texts, it fosters a more profound engagement with new information, enhancing effective learning.
To conclude, slow reading is a cornerstone of in-depth learning. It should not be passive but should allocate time for metacognition. By practicing the principles of slow reading, we not only understand the content we read but also expand our analytical capabilities, assess the utility of the learned content, and cultivate our descriptive language of the world in which we live.
Read more on Holistic News
Truth & Goodness
05 November 2024
Zmień tryb na ciemny